First, let me say I loved Feast. It was stylish and was just a breath of fresh air. Feast II: Sloppy Seconds was indeed that - a sloppy second! I understand that this was an attempt at horror comedy as opposed to the first which focused more on scares but I didn't find anything funny in the sequel. Any movie that resorts to having almost every character gag or vomit at some point in the movie definitely loses its credibility as being a sequel to one of the better low-budget horror releases for the last few years. I had no connection to any of the characters and you saw way too much of the creature. In Feast, you didn't see as much and that is what made it so great. In Feast 2, the monsters look like men wearing rubber costumes. It even had a poor quality feel. The first one didn't feel that way even though it was low-budget. I'm really hoping that they salvage this series with the third film because the second one did not hold up to the parent film. Some want to call it slap-stick but I just found it stupid. One of the only enjoyable qualities of this film was Honey Pie but even then, I still didn't understand the point of her character because she did nothing but stumble around the film with no clear purpose. Definitely not worth what I spent on it.

this is without a doubt one of the most gross,sick, and yet funny horror movies out there. it is supposed to be a sequel from the first, it picks up the morning after the attacks, this time it's in a different town. they show you a lot more of the creatures this time; a little too much if you ask me,, monster genitalia really not needed, let's get to the fun stuff, a monster giving it to the cat, a group of survivors tries to dissect the monster , all of a sudden fluids start spewing from the monsters body, all over the girls, i mean like in their mouths, and all of their bodies, you got a rotting, decomposing grandma, midgets being catapulted in the air, a baby thrown in the air and dropped, plus you got naked biker babes. movie is not much on plot, but makes up for it in gore, hot chicks, and oddities that you just don't see in other movies.

This is the second feast movie. And while the director remains the same (and some survivors from the first movie, too), it is not as rich and good as the first movie was. What you can't say though, is that the director had no ideas for this. While the introduction to characters has been changed from the written form to the moving picture form (a move I didn't approve of and was subsequently changed back in the follow up), the director had some craziness left up his sleeve.

The title is also very suggestive and could be taken the wrong way (anyone familiar with slang will know what "sloppy seconds" are). Therefor you shouldn't be too surprised if the movie does try to "dig" into strange territories. While the plot holes might be as big as they come (no pun intended), the movie still might get to you, if you let it.